Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 3:19 pm
qwerty wrote:
'Understanding a bit more now, inverter aircons take the warm air out of the cold air to add it to the cold air being heated.
So it uses the equivalent of 1 bar electric fire but outputs a 4 bar electric fire, so my neighbour is correct then 1kw in = 4 kw out'.
My understanding of a gas is that the temperature depends on the movement of it's atoms. More and faster movement = higher temperature. It would be very interesting to know how a device can remove some of this movement to excite different particles, especially if the temperature of the said gas is below that required. The idea of a colder gas heating a warmer one is a little difficult for me to swallow.
I have no doubt that modern heaters will be more efficient than previously, but I think there has to be another explanation and the 4 bar electric fire would have to be hopelessly inefficient for such a comparison to be true.
'Understanding a bit more now, inverter aircons take the warm air out of the cold air to add it to the cold air being heated.
So it uses the equivalent of 1 bar electric fire but outputs a 4 bar electric fire, so my neighbour is correct then 1kw in = 4 kw out'.
My understanding of a gas is that the temperature depends on the movement of it's atoms. More and faster movement = higher temperature. It would be very interesting to know how a device can remove some of this movement to excite different particles, especially if the temperature of the said gas is below that required. The idea of a colder gas heating a warmer one is a little difficult for me to swallow.
I have no doubt that modern heaters will be more efficient than previously, but I think there has to be another explanation and the 4 bar electric fire would have to be hopelessly inefficient for such a comparison to be true.