Stone wrote:Not entirely the whole answer - a lot of people in the UK earn above the average (about 49.99999% actually)
Wrong math. If A earns 10, B earns 20, C earns 30 and D earns 1000, whos above the average? Btw, UK has the lowest “above the average” number in EU… maybe that’s why so many immigrants seek refuge in BG. I don’t know why they prefer to be called Expats – might be the same reason why Bulgarians buy plasmas and mercedeses

Wrong use of - a few of things
a) Math is Maths as we are in Europe not the US - Thank God
b) You are failing to differentiate between Mean, Median and Mode(L) though with a sample income group of close to 50m (uk pop 62.3m less those unemployed less under 16's) the 3 tend to converge and even the gigantic earnings of the very few top (D in your example) fail to make a significant impact on the "average"
c) I hate being called an Ex Pat
d) I guess the reason why most here would prefer not to be called an Immigrant is the generally accepted usage of the term immigrant implies the person in question derives a benefit from the country they are an immigrant in - whereas, like it or not, most people here are of independent means (one way or another) and bring wealth into the country - I (my business) bring 170,000 Leva annually from oversees into BG that is spent with BG businesses, manufacturers and suppliers. I think the UK government would jump through hoops to have a few million - say retired Japanese immigrants to help level the BOTD
e) "Btw, UK has the lowest “above the average” number in EU" - the UK can not have the lowest "above average" NUMBER in the EU unless the UK has the lowest income receiving population in the EU. I guess your trying to point out that the UK has the tightest grouping around the average income and that the vast majority people are on a very similar and very low average income and 1% of the country earn very very much more than "average" - however this even this would need to be expressed in percentage's or fractions rather than numbers.
